Feedback from L'riot

Mister_Bruce wrote:Regarding the 'indefinite or almost indefinite' remark on the racking of spells, that isn't quoted in the LoG&S rulebook but the game designer has said that. I'll find the exact quote and link it to this thread. (I'm still trying to keep up with the number of rules clarifications that are being posted here and on the Google+ community).

I can actually imagine how both - the clarification and RAW - could apply here.
As Eidolon tends to correct, or one could say "perfect" the spells it could hung them indefinitely but without proper maintenance those spells would be "corrected" and set with the set of parameters with no lynchpins as those would be eliminated in the process of perfecting the spell by Eidolon. Which then could in theory result in having the sorcerer with lots and lots of hung spells that he wouldn't be able to use as their parameters and lack of lynchpins could make them unusable.
The idea to use Stuff as a factor when determining what happens with one's spells could work really well here.

Mister_Bruce wrote:Thanks for asking. Thanks for reading - it takes hours to write this stuff up so I'm glad that a number of you are getting some benefit/enjoyment out of it.

Well, being a long time Amber GM, asking questions like this has become my second nature .